The purpose of this Post is to make available “the nature of painting, “Chapter 3” of my book “Painting with Light and Colour”. It provides a quick run through some basic factors, which are so evident that some of their practical implications are too often overlooked. These are presented under four headings:
- Real surface/illusory pictorial space ambiguities.
- Whole-field colour/lightness interactions.
- What paintings can do that nature cannot.
- The human element.
All the chapters in my books have an “Introduction”. Below is the Introduction to Chapter 3. You can choose to read it now or when you click on the link to Chapter 3 that follows it.
It is difficult to imagine a more useful first guide to painting than the dogmas of Professor Marian Bohusz-Szyszko. However, they have their limits. Fortunately, as I believe the remainder of this book will make clear, it is both possible and worthwhile to go much more deeply into the reasons for both their strengths and their limitations. One approach to doing this is to trace the roots of the Professor’s assertions by reference to the work and ideas of his artist predecessors. Another, is to focus on the history of science and how it illuminated the subject of picture perception. Whichever our choice, it is inevitable that there will be much overlapping. The reason is that, in the nineteenth century, a particularly high proportion of the ideas influencing the community of progressive artists were rooted in the new ways of thinking about the world we live in that were emerging from science.
To prepare the way for the combination of theory and practice which provides the subject matter of the remainder of this book, this chapter offers a first introduction to basic factors that are necessarily in play when selections of artists’ pigments, mixed with various mediums are arranged on a circumscribed, flat picture-surface in such a way as to excite the feelings of people. The main reason for starting with these fundamentals is because:
- Taking them into consideration can help artists to achieve a surprising number of widely sought after goals.
- They provide reference points and context for so much of what follows.
- Their importance is too often overlooked by practicing artists.
The basic factors in question will be presented under the headings,“real surface/illusory pictorial space ambiguities”, “whole-field colour/lightness interactions”, “what paintings can do that nature cannot” and “the human element”.
CHAPTER 3 – “THE NATURE OF PAINTING”
A selection of student work in which all four of the basic factors listed above have been considered
Notice the range of:
- Subject matter, on the continuum between abstract and figurative.
- Depth of illusory pictorial space.
- Local and whole-field colour relationships.
For more Images of student work go to the main website and click on “student work“
Posts relating to other chapters from “Painting with Light and Colour”:
- Inroduction: the little known Science behind many of the original practical suggestions.
- Chapter 1 : The dogmas
- Chapter 2 : “doubts”.
- Chapter 3 : “The nature of painting”
- Chapter 4: Renaissance ideas
- Chapter 5 : New Science on offer
- Chapter 6 : “Early Modernist Painters”
Other Posts on light and colour in painting:
- What are colourists (1): Some of the many meanings of the word?
- What are colourists (2): Difference between meaning of the word for Venetian Colourists and for Modernist Colourists?
2 thoughts on “Basic factors in painting”
Je lis toutes ces informations avec beaucoup d’intérêt et chaque fois renouvelé. Merci Francis de ton partage généreux. Marie Thérèse rouffignac
Your posts always give me something to think about to deepen my explorations. Thanks!